Value Engineering &
management services

Better value isn’t simply about spending less. It’s about making every design, engineering, and development decision work harder for the project.

DEVNEX provides Value Engineering & Management services to help owners and development teams improve project feasibility, reduce unnecessary costs, simplify construction, and maximize the value of their land and investment.

JUMP TO





Our Value Engineering Approach

Our role is to examine the existing development strategy and identify where better solutions may exist. Every recommendation is considered in relation to feasibility, approvals, cost, constructability, schedule and long-term project value.

Key objectives


Reduce unnecessary expenditures
Identify areas where cost can be removed or redirected without compromising essential project performance.


Simplify construction complexity
Explore alternatives that can reduce difficult assemblies, construction risks and unnecessary site complexity.


Improve land-use efficiency
Review how the property is being utilized and identify opportunities to make better use of developable land.


Increase development yield
Identify opportunities to create additional usable or developable area where site and regulatory conditions permit.


Improve long-term operational value
Consider not only upfront construction costs, but the implications of decisions over the lifecycle of the development

Value Engineering methodology

Our Value Engineering process follows a disciplined, six-phase methodology that moves from information-gathering through to final recommendations.

Rather than treating cost reduction as an afterthought, we embed VE early enough in the process to influence design, planning, and delivery decisions — ensuring every recommendation is evaluated against feasibility, risk, and long-term project value before it ever reaches the client.

The process

The value we deliver

How Impact
Reduced civil and structural costs
Structured Value Engineering across planning, design, servicing, and delivery
ImpactFewer field conflicts, less rework, faster construction timelines
Optimized site and infrastructure
Site and infrastructure re-optimization
ImpactReduced earthwork, shorter road networks, simplified servicing
Tighter budget accuracy
Cost-linked scheduling and phased evaluation
ImpactMore accurate budgets and tighter cost variance through construction
Fewer field conflicts and faster builds
Early clash detection and BIM-based coordination
ImpactFewer field conflicts, less rework, faster construction timelines
Higher development yield
Engineering input at the planning stage
ImpactHigher development yield and stronger long-term asset performance

Case study: The Lookout

The Lookout is a 226,435.5 sq. ft. residential subdivision development in Newmarket, combining 4-plex, 6-plex, and townhouse units across a site with an elevation change of approximately 20 metres. Steep terrain, high civil costs, and complex regulatory constraints made this an ideal candidate for a full Value Engineering review.

The baseline design called for 646 metres of retaining walls across 29 separate wall assemblies, with some walls reaching heights of up to 10 metres. Combined with a 560-metre road network featuring hammerhead dead-ends and 38,455 m³ of excess earthwork export, the base case carried a civil and structural cost of $7.97M.

Before — Base Case
  • ↔646 m total retaining wall length
  • ▥29 separate wall assemblies
  • ↕Wall heights up to 10 m
  • $Base cost: $3.9M – $4.4M (methodology-dependent)
  • ▭Single tall walls between parallel roads
  • →Excess earthwork export: 38,455 m³
  • ≈Road length: 560 m with hammerhead dead-ends
  • ▦$7.97M total civil baseline (walls + soil + roads)
VE
After — VE
  • ▭Tiered / cascading walls — eliminate single tall walls
  • ✛Consolidate small assemblies → fewer, simpler types
  • ▥Segmental gravity walls replace post-and-panel
  • ◎Cost range: $2.55M target (Method 3 baseline)
  • ~Road shortened: 560 m → 364 m
  • ⊖Earthwork re-balanced with basement walls as retaining
  • ○Loop roads replace hammerheads, reduce dead-ends
  • $Estimated total savings: ~$1.0M – $1.5M on civil works
$0.00M
Baseline Civil Cost
Retaining walls + earthworks + roads
~$0.0M+
Projected Savings
Through VE design proposals
Cost Breakdown — Base vs. VE
Retaining Walls
$2.50M
$1.95M
Foundation Walls
$0.82M
$0.52M
Excavation
$2.22M
$1.18M
Road Works
$2.38M
$1.93M
VE Proposal Base Case

Your project might be worth more than you think.

Sometimes, the smartest way to move a project forward is to rethink how it’s being done.

Sometimes, the smartest way to move a project forward is to rethink how it’s being done. Whether you're facing rising costs, complex site conditions, or simply wondering if there's a better way, let's take a fresh look at your project and uncover opportunities you may not have considered.

LET'S GET STARTED

•

LET'S GET STARTED •